Bill and Melinda Gates took the stage at TED 2014 for an interview with Chris Anderson. It was a remarkable interview that gave an insight into the couple’s approach to philanthropy, raising their children while being the richest family in the world, and their shared belief of responsibility. Both Bill and Melinda Gates have genuine concern about the big problems facing societies and they are using their wealth to solving these problems for the greater good. One of the big takeaways of this interview for me was the partnership and complementary qualities they both bring to the Gates Foundation and their work.
Bill Gates, it seems, decides a problem is worth solving based on macro level data and statistics, for example, reducing child mortality, or eradicating polio worldwide. He then meets the scientists and experts in the respective fields to understand how these problems can be solved, what solutions, e.g., vaccines, are feasible, why previous approaches did not have the desired results, and so on.
Melinda Gates, on the other hand, seems to spend a lot of time in the field, talking with a lot of people, women, children, families, and understanding the social barriers to adoption of solutions, and how solutions need to be delivered in specific regions so that they can actually have the desired impact. She gives the example of how women need to be made comfortable to accept polio drops in their child’s mouth. She states:
“The delivery is every bit as important as the science.”
This is phenomenal collaboration. In many companies, the engineers and architects have a very good idea of the feasibility of a solution based on the state of technology. They can push the technology envelope in pursuit of complex problems. This has given rise to many technological advances in many areas, whether it is the ability to handle massive amounts of data, or increasing battery life, or using robotics to perform manual tasks, or speech recognition.
The product managers have a very good idea of what problems customers face. They understand the problem from various angles, and figure out which problems are worth solving. This requires immersing oneself into the customer’s environment and having empathy for the customer’s pain and situation. Melinda Gates and her daughter stayed overnight with an African family, which is vastly different from just visiting for a few hours. Now, product managers may not have this luxury of time and relationship that the Gates’ have in their target markets, yet it is something that requires energy, time, effort, and the Gates family have given that.
To be sure, Bill Gates is also in the field where the Foundation’s work is being carried out. Whenever possible, a product manager should include and invite engineering team members to meetings with customers. It is an opportunity for people who are focused on the technology and building the product to experience the problems in the field and interface with customers. This also gives an added benefit that there are two people to ask questions, listen, observe and take notes. This goes a long way in building credibility with each other.
As Melinda Gates demonstrates, it is not simply enough to understand the problem. It is also important to understand what might impede the adoption of a solution. There are various factors that contribute to the “total cost of ownership”. Some of these are tangible and quantifiable, such as costs of procurement, costs of deployment, add-on services necessary to make the product work in a specific configuration or environment, etc., while the aspect of being labeled a “Glasshole” can entail some emotional and social cost.
Understanding adoption constraints is very important. They influence the design of the product. When I worked at McAfee and the team built the technology for the first cloud-enabled anti-virus solution, one of the design criteria was that customers should not have to upgrade their anti-virus product. We wanted hundreds of millions of McAfee customers to have this capability as soon as possible, without having to go through a product refresh and upgrade cycle. The technology was built and delivered keeping this high in mind.
Bill and Melinda Gates provide a model of collaboration and partnership that all of us building products can aspire to reach. She aptly summarizes it with:
“I know when I come home, Bill is going to be interested in what I learnt. And he knows when he comes home, I’ll be interested. We have a collaborative relationship, but we don’t spend every minute together.”
There is clear division of roles and responsibilities. Clearly Melinda Gates does not sit in on every technical meeting that Bill has with scientists and experts in various fields. She could not do her work in the field if she were to do that. Yet, in many organizations, when I speak with product managers and executives, I hear that product managers end up attending more than the necessary share of engineering meetings. They also end up being project managers. This carries a high opportunity cost. Everyone tries to know and stay up to date with everything there is to know on a project, but this is just not practical. This is where we need to rely on each other with trust.
Having strong project managers allows product managers keep a good balance between inbound and outbound activities. Similarly, for teams being Agile, the Product Owner is a role that works with engineers more closely and tactically on a day to day basis allowing the Product Manager to be more strategic with understanding the market, customers and competition.
Healthy Tension vs Healthy Debate
Let’s assume that Bill and Melinda Gates are like any other couple in that they don’t agree on everything and debate with and question each other. As long as this happens in a collaborative manner without losing sight of the goal, without egos and personalities getting involved, it makes for a great partnership.
Many product teams get caught up in the opposite, unfortunately. Engineering leaders don’t trust product managers to know and prioritize what the product needs to do. Product managers think that engineering leaders are being less than forthcoming with estimates and schedules. These are real issues teams face, so I am not minimizing them. Everyone likes to think that a little bit of “healthy tension” goes a long way in keeping everyone honest. Well, tension cannot be healthy, debates can be healthy, and they should. Teams that work effectively leave pride and ego at the door. They have the realization that every individual has an opportunity to contribute to the learning and growth of another, and the goal is bigger than any one of them.
The technologists and product managers both have unique strengths. A high degree of collaboration, mutual trust and the right organizational structure can help both to partner effectively towards a common goal. Bill and Melinda Gates set a great example.